To Study the Biochemical Markers for the Prediction of Fistula Formation after Pancreatic Resection Surgery in the Post Operative Period
Biochemical Markers for the Prediction of Fistula Formation
Background: To study and assess the potential laboratory biomarkers for foreseeing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatic resection medical procedures. Subjects and Methods: 64 patients were studied from Jan 2008 to Dec 2018. All patients undergoing Pancreatic resection surgeries like Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), distal Pancreatectomy (DP) for tumors of the periampullary region, Pancreatic body or chronic pancreatitis Clinical data of the patients, surgical approach, pancreatic parenchymal tissue consistency, histopathology of the specimen, white blood cell count and blood amylase levels tube Drain fluid amylase were recorded and analyzed. Correlations between these parameters and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were assessed. Results : 22 out of the 64 (34.37%) patients developed POPF. The fistula was graded according to the ISPG classification. It was Grade An of every 10 (45.45%) patients, grade B in 8 (36.36%), and grade C in 4 (18.18%),.On univariate and multivariate strategic relapse investigations, higher amylase levels in the stomach waste liquid on a postoperative day (POD)1 and higher serum amylase levels on POD4 indicated a critical relationship with fistula arrangement in the post-operation period (POPF) (P < 0.05). On ROC (recipient working trademark bend) examination, amylase cut-off degree of 2270.67 U/L in the stomach waste liquid was related with a 76.6% affectability and 82% particularity [area under the bend (AUC): 0.844; P = 0.009]. A cut-off serum amylase level of 53.2 U/L was related with a 74.6% affectability and 72.9% explicitness (AUC: 0.784; P = 0.05). Conclusion: Post-operative channel liquid amylase levels on day 1 and serum amylase level on day 4 speak to interesting biomarkers related to POPF improvement after the pancreatic medical procedure.
Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC, Norton JA, Poultsides GA. Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB. 2013;15(2):142–148. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00563.x.
Vollmer CM, Sanchez N, Gondek S, Mcauliffe J, Kent TS, Christein JD, et al. Pancreatic Surgery Mortality Study Group. A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(1):89–103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1753-x.
Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM, Grewal SS, Hanse- man DJ, Maithel SK, et al. Factors Influencing Readmis- sion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2012;256(3):529–537. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318265ef0b.
Gulbinas A, Barauskas G, Pundzius J. Preoperative stratifica- tion of pancreas-related morbidity after the Whipple procedure. Int Surg. 2004;89(1):39–45.
Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagener V, Z’graggen K. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87(7):883–889. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01465.x.
Kingsnorth AN. Duct to mucosa isolated Roux loop pancreati- cojejunostomy as an improved anastomosis after resection of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;169(5):451–453.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222(4):580–588. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199510000-00014.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J. International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.
Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, Sick O, Makowiec F, Höppner J. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB. 2010;12(10):696–702. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00239.x.
Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393(4):459–471. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0324-4.
Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Mantovani W, Butturini G, Gumbs AA, et al. Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pan- creaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenec- tomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 2003;134(5):766–771. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00345-3.
Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Teeatment of Carci- noma of the Ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 1935;102(4):763– 779. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-193510000-00023.
Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(8):1050–1061. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8788.
Lillemoe K, Cameron J, Kim M, Campbell K, Sauter P, Coleman J, et al. Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg . 2004;8(7):766–774. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.06.011.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, et al. Six Hundred Fifty Consecutive Pancreati- coduodenectomies in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 1997;226(3):248–260. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004.
Deoliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244(6):937–939. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
Lee SE, Yang SH, Jang JY, Kim SW. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: interrupted vs continuous stitches. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(40):5351–5356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5351.
Kazanjian KK. Management of Pancreatic Fistulas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):849– 849. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.9.849.
Veillette G, Dominguez I, Ferrone C, Thayer SP, Mcgrath D, Warshaw AL. Fernández-del Castillo C. Implications and man- agement of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenec- tomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg. 2008;143(5):476–481. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476.
Cloyd JM, Kastenberg ZJ, Visser BC, Poultsides GA, Norton JA. Postoperative Serum Amylase Predicts Pancreatic Fistula Formation Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(2):348–353. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2293-3.
Henegouwen MIVB, Wit D, Gulik LTV, Obertop TM, Gouma H, J D. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(1):18–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00007-0.
Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M, et al. Pancreatic Fistula Rate after Pancreatic Resection. Dig Surg. 2004;21(1):54–59. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000075943.
Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998;133(10):1094–1098. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1094.
Popiela T, Kedra B, Sierzega M, Gurda A. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri- ampullary cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51(59):1484– 1488.
Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Yamaue H. How Do We Predict the Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy?—An Analysis in 244 Consecutive Patients. World J Surg. 2009;33(12):2670–2678. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0220-2.
Relles DM, Richards NG, Bloom JP, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Leiby BE, et al. Serum Blood Urea Nitrogen and Serum Albu- min on the First Postoperative Day Predict Pancreatic Fistula and Major Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):326–331. Available from:
Ryan AM, Hearty A, Prichard RS, Cunningham A, Rowley SP, Reynolds JV. Association of Hypoalbuminemia on the First Postoperative Day and Complications Following Esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(10):1355–1360. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0223-y.
Mahkovic-Hergouth K, Kompan L. Is the replacement of albumin in major abdominal surgery useful? J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(1):42–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.06.007.
Welsch T, Frommhold K, Hinz U, Weigand MA, Kleeff J, Friess H, et al. Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications. Surgery. 2008;143(1):20–28. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.06.010.
van den Bos R, Taris R, Scheppink B, de Haan L, Verster JC. Salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase levels during an assessment procedure correlate differently with risk-taking measures in male and female police recruits. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;7:219–219. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00219.
Okano K, Kakinoki K, Suto H, Oshima M, Kashiwagi H, Yamamoto N, et al. Persisting ratio of total amylase out- put in drain fluid can predict postoperative clinical pancre- atic fistula. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2011;18(6):815–820. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0393-6.
Copyright (c) 2020 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.