Study of Supratentorial Tumours by Computed Tomography

Study of Supratentorial Tumours by Computed Tomography

  • Prashanth G Patil Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Akash Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Devanahalli, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • KM Nataraj Professor, Department of Surgery, JJM Medical College, Davanagere, Karnataka, India
  • Shaik Hussain Saheb Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, JJM Medical College, Davanagere, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Background: Brain neoplasms may be classified by the location of supratentorial, infratentorial and midline tumours. Of the supratentorial neoplasms, meningiomas are the most frequent extra-axial neoplasms. CT has become the most important diagnostic procedure in evaluating patients suspected of harboring an intracranial tumor. It is still considered the basic radiologic study since it gives specific information for the management of brain tumours and is minimally invasive. The purpose of this study was to assess the distribution, features, localization and extent of supratentorial neoplasms. Subjects and Methods: Fifty cases with symptoms of intracranial pathology and on CT found to have supratentorial tumours were studied. Results: The CT patterns of 50 supratentorial tumours were reviewed, out of which 30 cases i.e. 60%, were found to be intra- axial and 20 i.e. 40% extra-axial tumours. GBM formed the major group of the intra axial tumours i.e. 18 %, and meningiomas formed the major extra-axial tumours forming 26%. Conclusion: CT proves to be a valuable modality of imaging in evaluating the distribution, features, localizing and assessing the extent of various intra and extra-axial tumours in the supratentorial region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bondy ML, Scheurer ME, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davis FG, Il’yasova D. Brain Tumor Epidemiology: Consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium (BTEC). Cancer. 2008;113((7 Suppl)):1953–1968. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23741.

Patibandla MR, Bhattacharjee S, Uppin MS, Purohit AK. Outcome of supratentorial intraaxial extra ventricular primary pediatric brain tumors: A prospective study. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2014;9(3):216–220. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.147571.

Lyndon D, Lansley JA, Evanson J, Krishnan AS. Dural masses: meningiomas and their mimics. Insights Imaging. 2019;11:1– 22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0697-7.

Singh H, Maurya V, Gill SS. Computerised Tomogra- phy Features in Gliomas. Med J Armed Forces India. 2002;58(3):221–225. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80134-4.

Baker HL, Houser OW, Campbell JK. Baker HL National cancer institute study. Evaluation of Computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial Neoplasms. Radiology. 1980;136(1):91–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.136.1.7384529.

Leeds NE, Elkin CM, Zimmerman RD. Gliomas of the brain. Seminars Roentgenol. 1984;19(1):27–43. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0037-198x(84)90041-5.

Butler AR, Passalaqua AM, Berenstein A, Kricheff II. Contrast enhanced CT scan and radionuclide brain scan in supratentorial gliomas. Am J Roentgenol. 1979;132(4):607–611. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.132.4.607.

Birjandi A. Oligodendrogliomas A report of 35 cases. Iranian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;17(41):19–25.

Armington WG, Osborn AG, Cubberley DA, Harnsberger HR, Boyer R, Naidich TP, et al. Supratentorial ependymoma: CT appearance. Radiology. 1985;157(2):367–372. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.157.2.4048443.

Chiechi MV, Smirniotopoulos JG, Jones RV. Intracranial subependymomas: CT and MR imaging features in 24 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(5):1245–1250. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.165.5.7572512.

Jack CR, Reese DF, Scheithauer BW. Radiographic findings in 32 cases of primary CNS lymphoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(2):271–276. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.146.2.271.

Spillane JA, Kendall BE, Moseley IF. Cerebral lymphoma: clinical radiological correlation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychi- atry. 1982;45(3):199–208. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.45.3.199.

Chambers EF, Turski PA, Sobel D, Wara W, Newton TH. Radiologic characteristics of primary cerebral neuroblastomas. Radiology. 1981;139(1):101–104. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.139.1.7208909.

Baker HL, Houser OW, Campbell JK. National Cancer Institute study: evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial neoplasms. I. Overall results. Radiology. 1980;136(1):91–6. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.136.1.7384529.

Parker RJ, Sutton LN, Rosenstoch JG, Bilaniock LT, Zim- merman RA. Pineal region tumours of childwood. Pediatr. 1994;9(3):217–226.

Fujimaki T, Mastsumani M, Furada N, Kirino T, Takakura K, Nakamura O, et al. CT and MRI features of intracranial germ cell tumours. Jour Neurooncol. 1994;9(3):217–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01053275.

Smirniotopoulos JG, Rushing EJ, Mena H. Pineal region masses: differential diagnosis. RadioGraph- ics. 1992;12(3):577–596. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.3.1609147.

Weisberg LA. Clinical and computed tomographic cor- relations of pineal neoplasms. Computerized Radiol. 1984;8(5):285–292. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0730-4862(84)90040-4.

Curenes JT. MR imaging of peripheral intracranial neoplasms. Extra axial v/s Intraxial masses. J Comput Assis Tomogr. 1987;11(6):932–937. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198711000-00002.

Zimmerman HM. Brain Tumors—Their incidence and classification in man and their experimental production. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1969;159(2):337–359. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A//dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb48290.x.

Paul EJ. Diagnosis of intracranial neoplasms. Neuroradiology. 1980;66:675–683.

Rohringer M, Sutherland GR, Louw DF, Sima AA. Incidence and clinicopathological features of meningioma. J Neurosurg. 1989;71((5 Pt 1)):665–672. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.71.5.0665.

Lyndon D, Lansley JA, Evanson J, Krishnan AS. Dural masses: meningiomas and their mimics. Insights Imaging. 2019;11:1–22. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0697-7.

Buetow MP, Buetow PC, Smirniotopoulos JG. Typical, atyp- ical, and misleading features in meningioma. Radiographics. 1991;11(6):1087–1106. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.11.6.1749851.

Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, Brotchie P, Trost N, Sutherland T. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(1):113–122. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0302-4.

Eric RJ, George AE, Irvin KL, Budzlovich G. Atypical CT features of intracranial meningiomas. Radiological - Pathological correlation in a study of 131consecutive cases. Radiology. 1980;135:673–682.

Kovas SK, Horvath E, Sl A. Classification and pathology of pituitary tumours. Newyork: Mc Graw-Hill; 1984.

Kunimatsu A, Kunimatsu N. Skull Base Tumors and Tumor- Like Lesions: A Pictorial Review. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:398–409. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.901937.

Fitz R, Charles. CT in Craniophagiomas. Radiology. 1978;127:687–691.

Published
2020-07-05
How to Cite
Patil, P. G., KM Nataraj, & Saheb, S. H. (2020). Study of Supratentorial Tumours by Computed Tomography. Asian Journal of Medical Radiological Research, 8(1), 114-121. https://doi.org/10.47009/ajmrr.2020.8.1.21