Retrospective Clinical Study on Epistaxis

Clinical Study on Epistaxis

Abstract

Background: Epistaxis is bleeding through nose. It is most common emergency situation in ENT that is disastrous to the patient and troublesome to treat for doctors. It is seen that 60% population experiences epistaxis in their life time and only 6% went to take consultation. The study  aims to evaluate incidence, etiology, provoking factors and cost effective management. Subjects and Methods: A 3 years retrospective study between September 2015 to August 2018 carried out in Anugarah Narayan Magadh Medical College & Hospital, Gaya on 98 admitted epistaxis patients. Results: Total 11,667 patients came in ENT department among them 2,723 patients with nasal complain. Incidence was0.84% among all cases and 3.6% among nasal problems. No obvious cause seen in 34 cases (34.23%) then cardiovascular cause in 32 cases (32.65%) then infection in19.32% and lastly by trauma in 5.68%. Maximum patients in 40-50 years age group 36% and minimum in 70-80 years 1%. Most patients belong to urban76 cases (77.27%) and middle age 36 cases (36.36%). Males are more prone 57 cases (57.95%) with ratio 1.39:1. Mostly in January-March months 45 cases (46.59%). Most patients came with unilateral epistaxis 86 cases (87.5%). About 26cases (26.14%)came with single episode whom urgent treatment required. Well managed with Nonsurgical method to 85 patients (86.73%) by anterior nasal packing (ANP) in 43 cases (43.87%) and chemical cauterization to 19 cases(19.30%) while surgical treatment given to 13 patients (13.26%).Some required electrocauterization 16 cases (16.32%) with bipolar. Mean hospital stay length 3.2 days. Blood transfusion required in 7cases (7.14%). Conclusion: Cost effectively anterior nasal packing is best conservative indirect method and electrocauterization is very effective direct method.